Wiki Rubric for Evaluation of Wiki Collaboration

Rubric Summary
Total Points: 54
Criterion
Max Points Awarded
A: Research
6
B: Content
18
C: Organization and Layout
6
D: Contextual Links
6
E: Graphics and Multimedia
6
F: Citation
6
G: Collaboration
6





Criteria

5-6

3-5

1-2

0

Max points awarded

A: RESEARCH - Finding and Understanding
A variety of information from appropriate sources has been accessed and relevant material has been carefully selected. There is a list of correctly cited resources all or most of which are referred to on the wiki page. The bookmarking tool (del.icio.us, diigo) and tagging have been used effectively.
A variety of information from appropriate sources has been accessed and organised. There is a list of resources that is mostly cited correctly, some of which are referred to on the wiki page.
Some information has been accessed and is shown in a list of resources that may or may not be cited correctly.
The work does not meet the standard described in level 1.

B: CONTENT - Originality
Provides a fresh and balanced perspective on the topic.
Provides original ideas with a minimum of personal bias.
Provides one or two original ideas which include some personal bias.
Does not provide any original ideas and personal bias is obvious.

B: CONTENT - Current News and Issues
Current news and issues relevant to the chosen topic have been listed, discussed and analyzed.
Current news and/or issues relevant to the chosen topic have been listed and discussed.
Current news and issues relevant to the chosen topic have been listed.
The work does not meet the standard described in level 1.

B: CONTENT - Comprehension and Logic
Provides comprehensive insight, understanding, and reflective thought about the topic while explaining all ideas clearly and concisely in a logical progression with effective supporting evidence.
Provides a moderate amount of insight, understanding, and reflective thought about the topic and explains most ideas clearly and concisely with supporting evidence.
Provides only minimal understanding, or reflective thought about the topic and/or
incompletely explains ideas and does not effectively use supporting evidence.
The work does not meet the standard described in level 1.

C: ORGANIZATION and LAYOUT
Uses a consistent organizational structure that includes grouping related information, defines specialized vocabulary and/or provides a table of contents and
makes frequent and effective use of headings, fonts, bullet points and white space to enhance the content’s visual appeal and increase readability.
Uses an organizational structure which groups some but not all, related information, defines specialized vocabulary and/or provides a table of contents and makes occasional use of headings, fonts, bullet points and white space to enhance the content’s visual appeal and increase readability.
Uses a loosely defined organizational structure which attempts to group similar items and/or
makes minimal use of headings, fonts, bullet points and white space to enhance visual appeal and readability.
The work does not meet the standard described in level 1.

D: CONTEXTUAL LINKS
Includes links to websites or documents that enhance the information presented and connects to relevant, up-to-date resources.
Includes links to websites or documents, but not all links enhance the information presented and connects to resources which are usually relevant and up-to-date.
Includes links to websites or documents which add little value to the information presented and/or connects to many outdated resources which appear to have only a minimal connection to the topic.
The work does not meet the standard described in level 1.

E: GRAPHICS and MULTIMEDIA
Selects high quality graphics and multimedia when appropriate to enhance and clarify the content and acknowledges all image and multimedia sources with captions or annotations.
Selects graphics and multimedia which are mostly high quality and enhance and clarify the content and acknowledges most image and multimedia sources with captions or annotations.
Selects many low-quality graphics and multimedia which do not enhance the content and /or acknowledges only a few multimedia and image sources and uses incomplete captions or annotations.
The work does not meet the standard described in level 1.

F: CITATION
Accurately cites all sources of information to support the credibility and authority of the information presented and uses standard bibliographic format.
Most sources are cited accurately, and support the credibility of the information presented and usually uses standard bibliographic format.
Few sources are cited accurately, and they fail to adequately support the credibility of the information presented and/or does not consistently use standard bibliographic format.
The work does not meet the standard described in level 1.

G: COLLABORATION
Contributes equally with other group members in researching, writing, and editing.
Assists group members with most of the researching, writing and editing.
Provides minimal assistance to group members in researching, writing and editing, and does not follow through with all tasks.
Provides no assistance to group members in any of the researching, writing and editing and does not follow through with any of the tasks.


Sources for Rubric material:
http://www2.uwstout.edu/content/profdev/rubrics/wikirubric.html
http://fcp12-1.flatclassroomproject.org/Rubrics
http://flatclassroomproject.wikispaces.com/Rubrics